Process
Areas
(staged)

Level 2
 
REQM
 PP
 PMC
 SAM
 MA
 PPQA
 CM
Level 3
 
RD
 TS
 PI
 VER 
 VAL 
 OPF
 OPD
 OT
 IPM
 RSKM
 DAR
Level 4
 
OPP
 QPM
Level 5 
 
OPM 
 CAR

      5. Process Areas
          5.3. Decision Analysis and Resolution
              SG 1 Evaluate Alternatives
 SP 1.1 Establish Guidelines for Decision Analysis 
Process AreaDAR
Level3
GoalSG 1
PracticeSP 1.1

Establish and maintain guidelines to determine which issues are subject to a formal evaluation process.

Not every decision is significant enough to require a formal evaluation process. The choice between the trivial and the truly important is unclear without explicit guidance. Whether a decision is significant or not is dependent on the project and circumstances and is determined by established guidelines.

Typical guidelines for determining when to require a formal evaluation process include the following:

· A decision is directly related to issues that are medium-to-high-impact risk.

· A decision is related to changing work products under configuration management.

· A decision would cause schedule delays over a certain percentage or amount of time.

· A decision affects the ability of the project to achieve its objectives.

· The costs of the formal evaluation process are reasonable when compared to the decision’s impact.

· A legal obligation exists during a solicitation.

· When competing quality attribute requirements would result in significantly different alternative architectures.

 

Refer to the Risk Management process area for more information about evaluating, categorizing, and prioritizing risks.

Examples of activities for which you may use a formal evaluation process include the following:

· Making decisions involving the procurement of material when 20 percent of the material parts constitute 80 percent of the total material costs

· Making design-implementation decisions when technical performance failure can cause a catastrophic failure (e.g., safety-of-flight item)

· Making decisions with the potential to significantly reduce design risk, engineering changes, cycle time, response time, and production costs (e.g., to use lithography models to assess form and fit capability before releasing engineering drawings and production builds)

 

Example Work Products

1.    Guidelines for when to apply a formal evaluation process

Subpractices

1.    Establish guidelines for when to use a formal evaluation process.

2.    Incorporate the use of guidelines into the defined process as appropriate.

Refer to the Integrated Project Management process area for more information about establishing the project’s defined process.




Process
Areas
(continuous)


Process
management  
 
OPF
 OPD
 OT  
 
OPP  
 OPM

Project
management
 
PP
 PMC 
 REQM 
 
SAM  
 
IPM
 RSKM
 
QPM

Engineering
 
RD 
 TS
 PI
 VER 
 VAL
Support
 
CM
 PPQA
 MA
 
DAR
 CAR